Legal approaches to taxation of transactions with digital assets in the EU: experience for Ukraine

Authors

  • Yefremova Kateryna PhD in Law, Senior Researcher, Associate Professor of the Department of Financial Law of the Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University , кандидатка юридичних наук, старший науковий співробітник, доцентка кафедри фінансового права Національного юридичного університету імені Ярослава Мудрого https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1917-9691 (unauthenticated)
  • Dmytro Kobylnik 2nd PhD in Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Tax Law of the Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University , доктор юридичних наук, професор, завідувач кафедри податкового права Національного юридичного університету імені Ярослава Мудрого https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-7963 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2024-4(48)-1

Keywords:

digital (virtual) assets, cryptocurrencies, taxation of transactions with digital assets, financial stability, MiCA

Abstract

Problem setting. With the development of digital technologies and the rapid growth of the digital asset market, governments face the important task of developing effective mechanisms for taxing transactions with these assets. The year 2024 is a turning point for global regulation in this area. In the European Union, this area has received considerable attention. The introduction of regulatory initiatives on digital assets allows for a transparent legal framework for an effective fiscal policy that promotes investment and the development of innovative technologies. The example of the EU shows various legal approaches to the taxation of transactions with digital assets, including both attempts at unification and reflection of the national peculiarities of the member states.

Analyses of recent researches and publications. Certain issues of the legal nature and development of virtual assets have been studied by such national scholars as: A. Kud, M. Kucheriavenko, E. Smychok, A. Ovcharenko. With regard to the contributions of domestic scholars to the studied area of international experience in taxation of digital assets, the following scholars should be noted: L. V. Tovkun, S. O. Hrytsai, I. M. Kozak, O. Y. Akimenko. However, despite the numerous developments of scholars in this area, the taxation of transactions with digital assets is an urgent problem that requires an analysis of international experience to determine the most effective practices for Ukraine.

Purpose of research is to analyze the international experience of legal regulation of taxation of transactions with digital assets and income from them in the EU (on the example of France and Germany) and to justify the choice of effective approaches to improving the national taxation system in this area.

Article’s main body. The article examines the international experience of legal regulation of taxation of transactions with digital assets on the example of France and Germany. The author analyses the current legislative approaches of the European Union, in particular, the Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA), which provides clear regulation of transactions with crypto assets, investor protection and prevention of money laundering. The article also highlights the peculiarities of taxation of digital assets in Germany, where general tax legislation applies, and France, which has developed detailed rules for the exchange of crypto assets.

Conclusions and prospects for the development. The conclusions of the article include recommendations for adapting effective EU approaches to the Ukrainian tax system in order to create a transparent legal environment for digital asset transactions and protect the interests of investors.

A comparative analysis of approaches to the taxation of digital asset transactions in different EU countries shows that the EU, through the implementation of the MiCA and DAC8 , provides clear and transparent rules for the taxation of profits derived from digital asset transactions, which contributes to legal certainty and market stability.  Differentiated tax rates and transitional periods that allow the market to adapt to new conditions are an important part of effective regulation.

References

World Economic Forum. (2024, October). Digital Assets Regulation: Insights from Jurisdictional Approaches. Insight report. Retrieved from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Digital_Assets_Regulation_2024.pdf.

Berberich, M., Wohlfarth, T., & Tönningsen, G. (2021). Chapter 9: Germany. In M. S. Sackheim & N. A. Howell (Eds.). The virtual currency regulation review: Fourth edition (pp. 112–132). Law Business Research Ltd. Retrieved from: https://leplex.it/foto-articoli/217/varie/Italy.pdf

LOI n°2019-486 du 22 mai 2019 relative à la croissance et la transformation des entreprises (1). NOR : ECOT1810669L. Retrieved from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000038496102/ [in French].

Law of Ukraine On Preventing and Counteracting Legalization (Laundering) of Proceeds from Crime, Financing of Terrorism and Financing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, No. 361-IX (2019, December 6). Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/361-20#Text [in Ukrainian].

Shah, P. (2024, March 17). Europe’s blossoming admiration for crypto. CME Group. Retrieved from: https://www.cmegroup.com/articles/2024/europes-blossoming-admiration-for-crypto.html.

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. (2024, July 30). Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). Retrieved from: https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/digital-operational-resilience-act-dora_en

Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (recast). Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0065

Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/1937. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1114/oj

National Commission on Securities and Stock Market (2023, January 17). NSSMC on Cryptocurrency Taxation in Ukraine and Amendments to the Law on Virtual Assets. Retrieved from: https://www.nssmc.gov.ua/nktspfr-pro-opodatkuvannia-kryptovaliut-v-ukraini-ta-zminy-do-zakonu-pro-virtualni-aktyvy-interv-iu/ [in Ukrainian].

European Commission. (2021, July 20). Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism legislative package [Proposal for a directive]. European Commission. Retrieved from: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/anti-money-laundering-and-countering-financing-terrorism-legislative-package_en

OECD. (2022). International Standards for Automatic Exchange of Information in Tax Matters: Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework and Amendments to the Common Reporting Standard. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/896d79d1-en

European Commission. (2022, December 8). Taxation: New transparency rules require service providers to report crypto-asset transactions. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_7513

Council Directive (EU) 2023/2226 of 17 October 2023 amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. Retrieved from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/2226/oj

Banking Act of the Federal Republic of Germany (Kreditwesengesetz, KWG). Neugefasst durch Bek. v. 9.9.1998 I 2776; zuletzt geändert durch Art. 6 G v. 22.12.2023 I Nr. 411. Retrieved from: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kredwg/BJNR008810961.html [in German]

BaFin (2020). Guidance notice – guidelines concerning the statutory definition of crypto custody business (section 1 (1a) sentence 2 no. 6 of the German Banking Act (Kreditwesengesetz – KWG). Retrieved from: https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Merkblatt/mb_200302_kryptoverwahrgeschaeft_en.html

Case C-264/14. Skatteverket v David Hedqvist. Common system of value added tax (VAT). 2015. ECR I-498. Retrieved from: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-264/14

BMF. (2018, February 27). Umsatzsteuerliche Behandlung von Bitcoin und anderen sog. Virtuellen währungen. Letter No. III C 3 – S 7160-b/13/10001. [in German]

Einkommensteuergesetz. In der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 08.10.2009 (BGBl. I S. 3366, ber. S. 3862). (2009, October 13). Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang. Retrieved from: www.bundesanzeiger-verlag.de [in German]

Banque de France. (2018). L’émergence du bitcoin et autres crypto-actifs: enjeux, risques et perspectives. Retrieved from: https://publications.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/medias/documents/focus-16_2018_03_05_fr.pdf [in French]

Code général des impôts. Version en vigueur au 03 août 2024. Retrieved from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006069577/ [in French]

Kuzhelko, K. (2022). Taxation of individuals holding cryptocurrencies in Europe: Comparative analysis of Germany, France and Italy. Master's thesis. Uppsala University. Retrieved from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1664749/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Published

2025-05-19