CONCEPTS AND REASONS FOR SELECTING PREVENTIVE MEASURES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31359/2311-4894-2019-27-3-118Keywords:
precautionary measures, grounds for precautionary measures, measures for ensuring criminal proceedings, pre-trial investigation, court proceedingsAbstract
The article is devoted to exploring the concept and reason for choosing preventive measures. The article analyzes a number of problematic issues regarding the concept and grounds for preventive measures in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter - the CPC of Ukraine). The approaches to studying the reasons for choosing preventive measures are highlighted.
Formulation of the problem. The relevance of the study is conditioned by the growing demands for ensuring the implementation of the principle of the rule of law in criminal proceedings in general and when applying the institute of preventive measures in particular. The above constitutional right is in conformity with Art. 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”, and in Art. 13 of the Declaration states that “everyone has the right to move freely and to choose his place of residence within each country”.
The purpose of this work is a general study and analysis of legal issues regarding the concept and reason for choosing preventive measures. In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary to solve interrelated tasks: to explore the concepts and reasons for choosing preventive measures; analyze their features.
The object of this study is the problematic issues regarding the concept and reason for choosing preventive measures.
Analysis of recent research. The study of the issues related to the study of the concept and reason for choosing preventive measures was carried out by such scientists as IL Petrukhina, VS Chistyakov, ZD Yenikeyev, ZF Kovryga, and Ukrainian VV Nazarov, O. P. Kuchinsky, P. P. Pylypchuk, S. V. Pastushenko, A. E. Omelchenko, V. O. Popelyushka, A. V. Moldovan, Yu.P. Alenina, Yu.M. Money, E.G. Kovalenko, V.T. Malyarenka, OB Murovina, V.S. Zelenetsky, V.V. Carob and others.
The purpose and purpose of investigating the reasons for applying preventive measures is to find out approaches to their concepts and types.
Presenting main material. The problem of applying preventive measures in criminal proceedings is one of the most important and complex problems of the science of criminal proceedings.
References
Zahalna deklaratsiia prav liudyny. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_015 [in Ukrainian]
Akademichnyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. URL: http://sum.in.ua/s/sutnistj. [in Ukrainian]
Farynnyk V.I. (2012). Osoblyvosti zastosuvannia zapobizhnykh zakhodiv u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Yurydychnyi visnyk Ukrainy – Legal Bulletin of Ukraine, 38, 4 [in Ukrainian]
Bondiuk A. (2017). Praktyka vyrishennia pytannia pro zastosuvannia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia v rozrizi protsesualnoi funktsii slidchoho suddi. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo – Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 2, 265-268 [in Ukrainian]
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Nechyporuk i Yonkalo proty Ukrainy» vid 21 kvitnia 2011 r. URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_683 [in Ukrainian]
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Miurrei proty Spoluchenoho Korolivstva» vid 28 zhovtnia 1994 r. # 300-A. URL: http://litigation.by/files/echr/ECHR_ Murray_v_Royaume_Uni_28_10_1994.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Pohoretskyi M.A. (2007). Obgruntuvannia rishen pro zastosuvannia prymusovykh zakhodiv u kryminalnykh spravakh pro orhanizovanu zlochynnist. Borotba z orhanizovanoiu zlochynnistiu i koruptsiieiu (teoriia i praktyka) - Fight Against Organized Crime and Corruption (Theory and Practice). Vol. 15. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/boz_2007_15_1.pdf2007 [in Ukrainian]
Derevianko M.I. (2015). Pidstavy zastosuvannia zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhliadi trymannia pid vartoiu. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva – Bulletin of Criminal Proceedings, 3, 49-55 [in Ukrainian]
Ahakerimov O.N. (2015). Pidstavy obrannia yak zapobizhnykh zakhodiv vzahali, tak i domashnoho areshtu zokrema, v svitli suchasnoho vitchyznianoho kryminalnoho provadzhennia. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia «Yurydychni nauky» – Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Legal Sciences Series, 3, 56-61 [in Ukrainian]
Ovchinnikov Yu.G. (2006). Domashniy arest kak mera presecheniya v ugolovnom protsesse. Candidate’s thesis. Moskva [in Russian]
Efimichev S.P. (1987). Ugolovno-protsessualnoye prinuzhdeniye i mesto mer presecheniya v reshenii zadach predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya. Ugolovno- protsessualnoye prinuzhdeniye i otvetstvennost. ikh mesto v reshenii zadach predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya: Sb. nauch. tr. Redkol: S.P. Efimichev (otv.red.) i dr. Volgograd [in Russian]
Davydov P.M. (1953). Mery presecheniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Leningrad [in Russian].
