The problem of applying reservations to international human rights agreements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2021-1(33)-10Keywords:
international agreement, reservations, Convention, human rightsAbstract
A problem statement. Human rights law, as a branch of public international law, to date, is mainly codified and consists mainly of treaty rules contained in universal and regional conventions. At the same time, in most cases, the parties to these agreements make reservations of both a substantive and procedural nature that apply to all generations of human rights. The question arises as to the legitimacy of the reservations declared by states to international acts on human rights and freedoms.
Аnalysis of research and publications. Many international lawyers deal with the issue of reservations to human rights treaties and their validity. Thus, the works of E.S. Alisievich, are devoted to this issue, I.I. Lukashuk, V.G. Butkevich, V.L. Tolstoy, M.V. Buromensky and others. However, there are a number of problems with the legal regime of reservations to human rights treaties. The main thesis that reveals their essence is that there is no mechanism for effective control over the legitimacy of such reservations.
The main text. The article considers the concept of reservations to international treaties, examines the problem of issuing reservations to international human rights treaties. The application of the institution of reservations is studied on the example of certain international treaties in the field of human rights, such as: the European Convention on Human Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. The case law of the European Court of Human Rights on the application of reservations to the European Convention on Human Rights is studied.
Conclusions. Today, the sovereign right of every state to stipulate international treaties is firmly established in international law, but there is no clear legal regulation of this institution that would prevent abuses by states in this area. We see the need to further study the institution of reservations to human rights treaties, its development and the development of general principles, procedures, and control over their legitimacy.
References
Videnska konventsiia pro pravo mizhnarodnykh dohovoriv 1969 r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_118#Text [in Ukrainian].
Samovich Yu. V. (2017). K voprosu ob ogovorkakh k dogovoram o pravakh cheloveka. Prava cheloveka: istoriya. teoriya. Praktika - Human Rights: History, Theory, Practice, 176-180 [in Russian].
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 24 (52), General comment on issues relating to reservations made upon ratification or accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols thereto, or in relation to declarations under article 41 of the Covenant, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6 (1994). URL: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/gencomm/hrcom24.htm [in English].
Konventsiia pro prava dytyny 1989 r. ULR: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/childcon.shtml [in Ukrainian].
Konventsiia pro likvidatsiiu vsikh form dyskryminatsii shchodo zhinok 1980 r. ULR: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/cedaw.shtml [in Ukrainian].
Multilateral Treaties Deposited with the Secretary-General: Status as at 31 December 1995, United Nationals. New York. 1996 r. URL: https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/publications/MTDSG/1995-english.pdf [in English].
Ivanova N. Yu. (2009). Institut ogovorok k mezhdunarodnym dogovoram (na primere Evropeyskoy konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod). Sootnosheniye mezhdunarodnogo i natsionalnogo prava: teoriya. praktika. problemy prepodavaniya: Sbornik nauchnykh statey i uchebno-metodicheskikh materialov (g. Sankt- Peterburg. 2009) – The ratio of international and national law: theory, practice, teaching problems: a collection of scientific articles and teaching materials. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Stalindzher ta Kuso proty Avstrii» (Stallinger and Kuso v. Austria) vid 26.01.1996. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-58029 [in Ukrainian].
Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Isensteken proty Avstrii» (Eisenstecken v. Austria) vid 10.01.2000. ULR: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-58826 [in Ukrainian].
Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Belilos proty Shveitsarii» (Belilos v. Switzerland) vid 18.07.1986. ULR: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-57434 [in Ukrainian].
Alisiyevich E. S. (2005). Ogovorki i zayavleniya o tolkovanii k polozhennyam Evropeyskoy Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnikh svobod. Vestnik RUDN. Yuridicheskiye nauki – Legal sciences, 2 (18), 144–150 [in Russian].
Khanski R., Suksi M. Vvedeniye v voprosy mezhdunarodnoy zashchity prav cheloveka. Moskva: «Prava cheloveka». 1997–1998. ULR: http://www.hrpublishers.org/site/site-files/library/introduction_on_the_topic_of_international_protection_of_human_rights.pdf [in Russian].
Doklad Komissii mezhdunarodnogo prava. Pyatdesyat sedmaya sessiya (2 maya – 3 iyunya i 11 iyulya – 5 avgusta 2005 goda). ULR: http://www.refworld.org.ru/pdfid/4a716c0e2.pdf [in Russian].
