EU values reflection in ECtHR case law

Authors

  • Dmytro Boichuk PhD in law, assistant professor at the European Union Law Department Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University , к.ю.н., ассистент кафедры права Европейського Союза Национального юридического университета имени Ярослава Мудрого , кандидат юридичних наук, асистент кафедри права Європейського Союзу Національного юридичного університету імені Ярослава Мудрого
  • Kateryna Torhashova 6-year student, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University , студентка 6 курса хозяйственно-правового факультета Национального юридического университета имени Ярослава Мудрого , студентка 6 курсу господарсько-правового факультету Національного юридичного унівесритету імені Ярослава Мудрого

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2021-3(35)-3

Keywords:

European Court of Human Rights, European Union, Member States of the European Union, legitimate goal

Abstract

The article focuses on the importance of the European Union's values in the development of the legal system of the member states of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and for the functioning of the European Union, further integration processes and their reflection in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The ideological interpretation and practical implementation of these decisions are reflected.

References

Anakina T. M., Komarova T.V., Trahniuk O.Ya. ta in. (2019) Pravo Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: osnovy teorii [European Union law: basics of theory]. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Achkinazi B. (2012) Aristid Brian i Yevropeiske prymyrennia Versalskoi doby (istoriohrafichnyi aspekt) [Aristide Brian and the European Reconciliation of the Versailles Age (historiographical aspect)]. Naukovi zapysky, vol.14, no. 18, pp. 44-45 [in Ukrainian].

Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union from 1992. EUR-Lex. URL:eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/uri=CELEX:12016M013 [in English].

Douglas-Scott S. The European Union and Human Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon. Human Rights Law Review.2012.pp. 658-670 [in English].

Horbatiuk S. (2017) Sotsiohumanitarna kontseptsiia yevropeiskoho soiuzu: tsinnisnyi vymir [Socio-humanitarian concept of the European Union: the value dimension]. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia, vol. 3, no. 52, pp. 114-117 [in Ukrainian].

OPINION 2/15 OF THE COURT (Full Court). InfoCuria Case law. 2017. URL:curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=190727&doclang=EN [in English].

Protocol (No 8) relating to Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union on the accession of the Union to the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. EUR-Lex.2012. URL: eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/uri=CELEX%3A12012E%2FPRO%2F08 [in English].

Protocol no. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the convention. Council of Europe treaty series. 2004. № 194 [in English].

Simpson P. Liberalism, state, and community. Critical Review. 1994. pp.1-4 [in English].

Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community. EUR-Lex.2007. URL: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/uri=CELEX%3A12007L%2FTXT 2 [in English].

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15