To the problem of defining the objects of scientific and scientific-technical activity

Authors

  • Mykhailo Makarov Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Research assistant of the Scientific and Research Institute of Providing Legal Framework for the Innovative Development of NALS of Ukraine , доктор філософії (PhD), молодший науковий співробітник Науково-дослідного інституту правового забезпечення інноваційного розвитку НАПрН України https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-9092 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2024-4(48)-6

Keywords:

scientist, scholar, subjects of scientific activity, scientific and technical activity, academic title, academic degree, research employee, individual researchers, graduate student, scientific research, implementation of scientific results

Abstract

Problem setting. The definition of subjects of scientific and scientific and technical activity in Ukraine is an important aspect of the legal regulation of the scientific process, which remains insufficiently regulated. The lack of a single category to designate all natural persons as subjects of scientific activity, such as graduate students, scientists, scientists, etc., not only creates legal uncertainty, but also complicates the regulation of the rights and obligations of different categories of researchers, including the issue of the legal status of graduate students , who are at the stage of professional training, requires special attention that the status significantly affects the legal relations regarding the results of their scientific research, as well as the possibility of integrating these results into practical activity In addition, an important aspect is the distinction between the rights and responsibilities of scientists and scientists, since the level of their influence on scientific and technological progress varies significantly depending on experience, qualifications and the stage of a scientific career. This issue, as well as the theoretical definition of the generalized category of scientists for individuals, are relevant for ensuring the effective commercialization of scientific developments, as well as for the proper organization of scientific activity in general.

Analysis of recent researches and publications. Next foreign scientists as Andrea Geuna and Antonio Muscio, Barry Bozeman, Henry Etzkowitz, David Siegel, Michel Perckmann, Vincenzo Tartari, Martin McKelvey, Robert Weugelers and Mike Rice studied the problems of implementing the results of scientific and scientific and technical activities in various aspects.

Domestic researchers are also actively working on the legal regulation of scientific and scientific-technical activities in Ukraine. Goncharov V. M., Egorov I. AND. and Zhukovich I. A., Semenyuk O. P., Lyubchych A. M., Hlybko S. V., Kresina I. O., Dobryanska N.O., Klimova H. P. and others.

Purpose of research is to analyze the legal regulation of scientific and technical activities, focusing on the categorization of researchers and their rights, particularly regarding intellectual property and the commercialization of scientific results. It examines the roles of various academic levels, from candidates of science to senior researchers, in shaping the legal status and protection of their work.

Article’s main body. The article explores the legal aspects of scientific and technical activities, focusing on the roles and responsibilities of researchers at different levels, such as candidates of science, doctors of philosophy, and senior academics. It addresses the categorization of these researchers and the importance of defining their rights, particularly in the context of intellectual property. The article also delves into the issue of commercialization and the legal implications of turning scientific results into marketable technologies. Additionally, it analyzes how these factors are regulated under Ukrainian law, with references to both national and international legal frameworks.

Conclusions and prospects for the development. The article underscores the need for clearer legal frameworks regarding the roles of individual researchers and the protection of intellectual property in Ukraine. It suggests that strengthening these regulations, along with fostering academic-industry partnerships, will facilitate the commercialization of research outcomes. Future developments should integrate international best practices to support innovation and enhance Ukraine’s position in the global knowledge economy.

References

Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature. Minerva, 47(1), 93–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2

Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 627–655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1

Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929605

Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology Transfer Offices and Commercialization of University Intellectual Property: Performance and Policy Implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640-660. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grm036

Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., et al. (2013). Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007

Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range Universities’ Linkages with Industry: Knowledge Types and the Role of Intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1205-1223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.021

Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Link: https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=5944

Litan, R. E., Mitchell, L., & Reedy, E. J. (2007). Commercializing University Innovations: A Better Way. NBER Working Paper, w13192. DOI: 10.3386/w13192

Honcharov, V. M. (2018). Scientific and technical activity as an object of legal regulation in Ukraine. Kyiv: NADU [in Ukrainian].

Yehorov, I. Yu., & Zhukovych, I. A. (2023). Evaluation of research results: new trends. Science and Science Studies, 2(120), 42–58 [in Ukrainian].

Semeniuk, O. P. (2019). Legal regulation of scientific and technical activity in Ukraine. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, 1, 48-55 [in Ukrainian].

Lyubchych, A. M., & Ohienko, I. (2022). Some aspects of the formation and development of research infrastructures and subjects of scientific and scientific-technical activities. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, Series: Law, 70, 466–471 [in Ukrainian].

Hlibko, S. V., & Lyubchych, A. M. (2024). Some issues of state certification of research institutions and higher education institutions regarding the conduct of scientific activities. Legal support of professional adaptation and the right to entrepreneurial activity of war veterans : Proceedings of the I Round Table (pp. 98-106). Kharkiv : NDI PZIR NAPrN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Kovalchuk, O. P. (2017). Legal support for scientific activity. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].

Kresina, I. O. (2019). Legal support for the innovative development of scientific and technical activity in Ukraine. Kyiv: Institute of State and Law named after V.M. Koretsky of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

Dobryanska, N. O. (2018). Organizational and legal foundations for the implementation of results of scientific and technical activities in Ukraine. Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 4, 11–17 [in Ukrainian].

Law of Ukraine On Scientific and Scientific-Technical Activities, No. 848-VIII (2015, November 26). Retrieved form: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/848-19#Text [in Ukrainian].

Law of Ukraine On Scientific and Scientific-Technical Activities, No. 848-VIII (2015, November 26). Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/848-19#Text [in Ukrainian].

Kozhuhar, S. M. (Ed.). (2020). Science and innovations in Ukraine: current state and prospects. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Lyubchych, A. M., & Ohienko, I. (2022). Some aspects of the formation and development of research infrastructures and subjects of scientific and scientific-technical activities. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, Series: Law, 70, 466–471 [in Ukrainian].

Yehorov, I. Yu., & Zhukovych, I. A. (2023). Evaluation of research results: new trends. Science and Science Studies, 2(120), 42–58 [in Ukrainian].

Honcharov, V. M. (2018). Scientific and technical activity as an object of legal regulation in Ukraine. Kyiv: NADU [in Ukrainian].

Ivanova, A. P. (2020). Legal aspects of scientific research activity: current state and prospects. Legal Ukraine, 12, 68–74 [in Ukrainian].

Shevchenko, A. O. (2019). Legal regulation of scientific research and developments in the field of information technologies in Ukraine. Law and Society, 4, 123–130 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2025-05-19