IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF FAIRNESS IN RELATIONS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT IN UKRAINE

Abstract

Problem setting. Article is devoted to analysis of implementation of the principle of fairness in relations of social  support in our country.
Social support is an important organizational form of social security. It should be based on the principle of social justice. The state is not able to provide its obligations in this area completely, which leads to restriction or deprivation of certain categories of social support, that is a clear manifestation of injustice. Therefore, it is necessary to study the indicated legal form of social security in terms of the principle of social justice in cases of installation , limitation or cancellation of social support to the population of Ukraine. Target of research. The purpose of this article is to study the support both the legal form of social welfare and of the principle of social justice in cases of installation , limitation or cancellation of social support to the population of Ukraine. Analysis of resent researches and publications. The scientists, who were engaged in research of the specified question, are: V. S. Andreev, V. M. Andriiv, N. B. Bolotina, A. D. Zaykin, M. L. Zakharov, S. M. Prylypko, E. G. Tuchkova, M. N. Shumylo, O. N. Yaroshenko and others. Article’s main body. The current system of social support of citizens of Ukraine does not provide correct protection of groups of population that is not covered by most social services. The principle of social justice should permeate the social support system, otherwise it just does not functionate as social protection. The state is trying to implement social support of citizens by creating and providing a number of benefits, compensations etc. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to implement them, because the amount of support exceeds the financial capacity of the state. The order will be equitable for social support of the population while the state will realistically assess their capabilities because narrowing or deprivation of certain rights is a clear manifestation of abuse of justice. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The equitable order for social support of the population while the state will realistically assess their capabilities. The state has no right firstly to set and secondly to narrow or deprive people of the rights to benefits and subsidies at their discretion. This limitation is only possible on the future successor, but not to those which already apply these provisions.